Time works in one direction,
things happen before other things happen,
one of those things that happens is that things come into being that weren't there before.
Before they came into being they didn't exist.
Things don't exist before they exist.
And on top of not understanding how time works he doesn't understand how sets work.
And he thinks he's such a big fat supporter of Charles Darwin when he can't even understand the most basic fact of how things would have to be for evolution to work and the basic concept of species, which are sets.
Truly, the American educational system is a decadent means of granting credential to paying customers. I think that's generally the case among the English speaking people, these days. Even the accredited ones are degree mills turning out idiots like that of whom it can only be said, in the words of William Cobbett:
his book-learning has only made him conceited.
Only, in the age of TV and the internet, they generally don't bother that much with books. Such people often go into that degraded thing called "journalism" these days. You don't have to actually know anything except what you are to say, the range of things which are to be said so that others can then say them. To compound the irony.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI've never been fat, I've seldom been stupid and I've never been literal minded, so you're going to have to speak for yourself, Simps. And I know how before and after works as well as set theory.
ReplyDelete"I know how before and after works as well as set theory."
ReplyDeleteThat's nice, dear. It's also utterly irrelevant to our discussion of the reality of the borough of Queens and the intent of the movie ALEXANDER NEVSKY.
I should add that it also proves my assertion that you're some kind of literal minded weirdo.
Have a swell day, shithead.
Whatever intent there was in Alexander Nevsky, there is not a single Nazi in it, they used a time period from before there were Nazis for whatever purpose there was and nothing they intended put one there. Though we've had this discussion before when I noted that that piece of shit movie about the Pony Express did just that and you had no problem with it. I prefer history to lazy-assed bullshit.
DeleteThe problem with your claim about Queens being the most ethnically diverse polity in the world is a. Queens is a part of a larger entity, New York City and it cannot be more ethnically diverse than New York City b. there are other cities in the world held by others to be more ethnically diverse than the hub of your personal universe on which your flabbly white guy desk-jockey-couch-potato ass sits. Your like in those places are, no doubt, as full of shit as you are and as narrowly parochial in their narrow minds. If there's so much ethnic diversity around you, it's funny that you're about as diverse in your outlook as the narrow, lily white corpus of the work of Woody Allen.
1. NEVSKY was explicitly made as a piece of anti-Nazi agit-prop, and not a single sentient mammal besides yourself who has ever seen it did not make the connection between the movie's Teutonic knights and the Nazis overrunning Europe during WWII. Also, you're an idiot to suggest otherwise.
ReplyDelete2. It doesn't fucking matter whether Queens is part of a larger entity; it is its own place with actual borders, its own government, and its own distinct culture. Also, you're an even bigger idiot to suggest otherwise.
3. Thank you for the comment about lily white Woody Allen, which provides me with more evidence -- not that I needed it -- that you're an anti-Semitic scumbucket. And have I mentioned you're also a world-class idiot?
Oh,Simps, I hate to tell you but Woody Allen does not equal Jews, neither do you. I'll bet that if someone wanted to do the exercise, I've had more positive content about more Jews on my blog than you have at yours. You pulling the "antisemite" line about me will be like Lindsay Graham (I'm told aka "Lady G") pulling the "queer basher" one when the outing of him has reached a sufficient level so he's not denying it anymore. He doesn't deserve to be protected from his hypocrisy and neither do you or the guy with the last standing color-line of a major member of the American movie industry. 1. and 2. I've answered so many times I'm not bothering anymore except to point out you are an idiot, something else I hope you repeat at Eschaton because there are a few people there who know enough about math and how, you know, before and after work to be reminded of how truly stupid you are when you bring it up.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete"On The Inadeuqacy Of Modern Education"
ReplyDeleteLast time I looked, there is no such word as "inadeuqacy". But kudos for proving your own point, albeit about yourself.
You know, I might do some of the typos to lead to you annoying the Eschatots by posting about it there.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteSure, that’s believable, Sparkles.
ReplyDeleteOh wait —the word I actually meant was “ludicrous.” I regret the error.😀
I've done it in the past, I know you can't resist giving me publicity by trying to get attention for yourself among people who . . . well, as they say, your "best friends" won't tell you but I will, they think you're an attention seeking putz. I don't want their attention, I just want you to annoy them, kill two turds with one drone.
Delete"I know you can't resist giving me publicity..."
ReplyDeleteSays the guy who maintains a blog for the sole purpose of letting me insult you.
I'd hardly call this maintenance, more containment of a virus. Those things you can't distinguish from insects.
DeleteAnybody know what language that comment is in?
Delete